A. Top 5 Worst Websites

1. http://yvettesbridalformal.com/


















-color: dirty colors.
-space: no space at all because of the overlapping of the text and colors.
-layout: confusing.
-navigation: can't see them all.
-interactivity: low.
-theme: is that monalisa? how dirty.
-visual identity: dirty..as in DIRTY.


well, i cannot prove this well because the background seems too full and dirty. Well, i can improve this by having a single colored background.






2.http://www.alternativetransportservices.co.uk/
















-color: fine colors.
-space: not too spacious.
-layout: simple text.
-navigation: good.
-interactivity: simple site.
-theme: i cannot identify it well.
-visual identity: it ok for me.

How can i improve it?hmmm.. by resizing the pictures as well as the text colors. I'll change the text color into a single one or by rearranging them one by one.




3.http://www.shakespeares-sonnets.com/















-color: bright.
-space: spacious.
-layout: not too bad.
-navigation: none.
-interactivity: bright sight.
-theme: tribute for Shakespeare?
-visual identity:trash site.


Well, whoever made this site, I can improve this by changing the color of the background because it is bad for the eyes and the text too is matching to the color of the background.



4. http://www.tallyhouniforms.com/















-color: assorted.
-space: none.
-layout: well organized.
-navigation: ok.
-interactivity: captive.
-theme: sky gazers?
-visual identity: it is like a comfort room.

I can improve this by having some lay-outs that are good and comfortable in the eyes of some. Like putting up some marquees and whatsoever.






5. http://www.usabilitynet.org/home.htm

















-color: simply white.
-space: none
-layout: bad.
-navigation: ok.
-interactivity: captive as usual.
-theme: it is like a finder.
-visual identity: pure simplicity.

I can manage to improve this site by having some nice pictures one by one and having the background colored and as well as the texts.

B. Top 5 Best Websites:

1. http://www.calvind.com/

-color: nice combination colors.

-space: spaceous.

-layout: simplicity.

-navigation: wide links.

-interactivity:

-theme: built-in professionals

-visual identity: pro site.

I can prove this site more by having the wide maintenance for the colors, pictures, and links. Managing teh effects or the animation is important too.

2.http://www.gulzar.com/














-color: simple but elegant.
-space: spaceous.
-layout: simple and captivity.
-navigation: poor links.
-interactivity: united.
-theme: boxed lay-out.
-visual identity: simpicity.

I can improve it by having some pictures as a design or pictures for background and posting more useful links and by adding color.

3.http://www.hectoplasma.com/















-color: balanced and good for the eyes.
-space: captive.
-layout: seeing this, i am impressed.
-navigation: for sure, it is more accurate.
-interactuivity: precisely.
-theme: nature lover?.. i thin so..
-visual identity: love it.. because it has the balance.

well, by seeing this, i am well impressed and was amazed because of all the sites that i had visited, all i could say is "Wow!" i don't have to do any changes bout this site.

4.http://www.meanscreens.com/index.htm














-color: balanced captive.
-space: just as the color.
-layout: some warnings or whatsoever.
-navigation: fine links.
-interactuivity: customize.
-theme: following the signs i think..
-visual identity: following rules are important.

I can prove this site by having some quotations for the rule breakers for them to realize that rules are very important for our safety.

5.http://holiday.gearyi.com/
















-color: simple.
-space: spacious as always.
-layout: unknown identifier?
-navigation: none.
-interactuivity: not user friendly.
-theme: we cannot predict future.
-visual identity: a ball with unknown object.

This should be improved. because it was so spacious at all. I recommend to put some sayings, pictures or any other Use-Friendly Components for the viewer not be bore.