-color: dirty colors.
-space: no space at all because of the overlapping of the text and colors.
-layout: confusing.
-navigation: can't see them all.
-interactivity: low.
-theme: is that monalisa? how dirty.
-visual identity: dirty..as in DIRTY.
well, i cannot prove this well because the background seems too full and dirty. Well, i can improve this by having a single colored background.
2.http://www.alternativetransportservices.co.uk/
-color: fine colors.
-space: not too spacious.
-layout: simple text.
-navigation: good.
-interactivity: simple site.
-theme: i cannot identify it well.
-visual identity: it ok for me.
How can i improve it?hmmm.. by resizing the pictures as well as the text colors. I'll change the text color into a single one or by rearranging them one by one.
3.http://www.shakespeares-sonnets.com/
-color: bright.
-space: spacious.
-layout: not too bad.
-navigation: none.
-interactivity: bright sight.
-theme: tribute for Shakespeare?
-visual identity:trash site.
Well, whoever made this site, I can improve this by changing the color of the background because it is bad for the eyes and the text too is matching to the color of the background.
4. http://www.tallyhouniforms.com/
-color: assorted.
-space: none.
-layout: well organized.
-navigation: ok.
-interactivity: captive.
-theme: sky gazers?
-visual identity: it is like a comfort room.
I can improve this by having some lay-outs that are good and comfortable in the eyes of some. Like putting up some marquees and whatsoever.
5. http://www.usabilitynet.org/home.htm
-color: simply white.
-space: none
-layout: bad.
-navigation: ok.
-interactivity: captive as usual.
-theme: it is like a finder.
-visual identity: pure simplicity.
I can manage to improve this site by having some nice pictures one by one and having the background colored and as well as the texts.
No comments:
Post a Comment